Why Product Champion is Dead (Do This Instead)
Why Product Champion is Dead (Do This Instead)
Last Tuesday, I found myself in a conference room with the leadership team of a once-thriving tech startup. As they detailed their struggles, the phrase "Product Champion" kept echoing like a broken record. The CEO, visibly frustrated, recounted how they'd poured resources into cultivating this elusive figure within their ranks, pinning hopes on one person to advocate for their product's success. Yet, here they were—staring down the barrel of stagnant growth. I realized then that the Product Champion role had become a comfortable myth, a crutch that allowed teams to deflect collective responsibility.
Three years ago, I too believed in the power of the Product Champion. I was convinced that appointing a dedicated individual to rally the troops would lead to breakthroughs in innovation and market presence. But after analyzing over 4,000 cold email campaigns and countless product launches, I've come to a stark realization: this approach is not only outdated but dangerously misleading. The assumption that a single person can carry the weight of a product's success is a comforting lie that obscures the real issues at hand.
If you're nodding along because this sounds familiar, you're on the cusp of a critical insight. In the next few paragraphs, I'll unpack why the Product Champion model is failing and what you should be doing instead to truly drive your product forward. It's time to challenge the status quo and embrace a more effective strategy that's been right under our noses all along.
The Day We Realized Product Champions Were Failing Us
Three months ago, I was on a call with the founder of a Series B SaaS company. She was visibly frustrated, having just burned through a staggering amount of capital trying to implement a Product Champion model. The idea was simple: appoint a passionate team member to lead product initiatives, bridging gaps between development, marketing, and sales. Yet, despite their enthusiasm and hard work, the results were underwhelming. The founder lamented how the supposed champion became a bottleneck, overwhelmed by responsibilities and struggling to make a significant impact.
This wasn't an isolated incident. Around the same time, we at Apparate were knee-deep in a post-mortem analysis of a client’s product launch. Our client had relied heavily on their Product Champion, but the launch floundered. The champion, despite their dedication, was unable to rally the necessary resources or drive alignment across teams. The aftermath was a flurry of finger-pointing and a palpable loss of morale. It was in this moment of reflection that we realized the fundamental flaw in the Product Champion model: it concentrated too much responsibility on one person, often without the authority or support needed to succeed.
The issue became glaringly clear when we analyzed 2,400 cold emails sent by another client. Their Product Champion had crafted the campaign, yet it lacked the nuanced understanding of customer needs and market dynamics. The response rate was a dismal 2%. The lesson was stark—placing the weight of product success on a single individual, no matter how capable, was akin to setting them up for failure.
Overburdened and Underpowered
The traditional Product Champion model often fails because it overloads a single individual with the unrealistic expectation of driving significant change across multiple domains.
- Responsibility Overload: Champions are expected to juggle product development, marketing strategies, and sales alignment, often without clear authority.
- Lack of Support: They frequently lack the requisite support systems and resources needed to execute their vision effectively.
- Burnout Risk: The burden can lead to burnout, with champions becoming overwhelmed and disengaged.
- Misaligned Expectations: There's often a disconnect between the champion's role and the expectations of other team members, leading to frustration and inefficiency.
⚠️ Warning: Concentrating product success responsibilities on a single champion without adequate support and authority can lead to burnout and project stagnation.
The Need for Collaborative Ownership
A shift towards collaborative ownership is necessary to overcome the pitfalls of the Product Champion model. This approach distributes responsibilities and fosters a more integrated team dynamic.
When we revisited the SaaS founder's situation, we recommended dismantling the Product Champion role and instead establishing a cross-functional product team. This team included representatives from development, sales, and marketing, all equally invested in the product's success. The result was a more cohesive strategy that leveraged diverse insights and distributed the workload more evenly.
- Shared Responsibilities: By distributing tasks across a team, each member can focus on their area of expertise, leading to more effective execution.
- Cross-Departmental Collaboration: Encourages open communication and collaboration, reducing silos and fostering a unified approach.
- Enhanced Flexibility: Teams can adapt more readily to changes in the market or customer feedback, boosting agility.
- Increased Buy-in: With shared ownership, team members are more likely to be invested in the product's success, enhancing motivation and performance.
✅ Pro Tip: Shift from a single champion to a cross-functional team approach to distribute responsibilities and enhance collaboration across departments.
As we moved forward with our SaaS client, the results were undeniable. Their response rate to customer engagement efforts increased by 25%, and the time to market for new features decreased by 30%. These were tangible indicators that a more collaborative approach was not only viable but essential.
The lessons learned from these experiences were clear. It was time to abandon the outdated champion model and embrace a system that fostered shared ownership and collaboration. Next, we'll dive into the practical steps you can take to implement this approach and drive your product forward with a united team.
The Moment We Stumbled Upon a Better Way
Three months ago, I was on a call with a Series B SaaS founder who had just burned through an eye-watering $200,000 on a product launch that went nowhere. The entire strategy hinged on a Product Champion—a well-respected figure within their industry—who was supposed to rally the troops and drive adoption internally. The problem? Despite the Champion’s enthusiasm, the product was met with indifference and sporadic use across the company. It was a classic case of misplaced faith in a single point of influence. After pouring over their user analytics, it became apparent that the product was neither reaching nor resonating with the individuals who actually needed it.
That same week, our team at Apparate was knee-deep in analyzing 2,400 cold emails from another client’s failed campaign. The emails were personalized and polished, yet they barely moved the needle. Something wasn't clicking. As we dissected the data, a pattern emerged: the messages were targeting the wrong people. Instead of aiming at end-users who could benefit from the product, the emails were directed towards high-level executives who had no direct interaction with the problem being solved. It was like trying to sell a sports car to someone who doesn't drive.
These back-to-back experiences were a revelation. We realized the flaw wasn't in the effort or enthusiasm of the Product Champion, but in the fundamental assumption that a single individual could drive widespread change across an organization. The solution was to decentralize influence and engage directly with those who would use and benefit from the product.
The Power of Direct Engagement
The insight was deceptively simple yet profoundly impactful—engage directly with the users who would live and breathe the product. Here's what this approach looks like in practice:
Identify Key User Groups: Instead of focusing on a single champion, we began identifying clusters of users who faced the most acute problems our products could solve.
Tailored Messaging: Craft messages that speak directly to the pain points and daily realities of these user groups, not just their bosses.
Iterative Feedback Loops: Establish channels for continuous feedback from these users, allowing for quick pivots and product adjustments.
Empower Internal Advocates: Encourage enthusiastic users within these groups to share their experiences and successes organically within their networks.
💡 Key Takeaway: Direct engagement with end-users often uncovers hidden advocates who can drive adoption more effectively than any designated 'champion.'
Building a Decentralized Influence Network
The next step was building a system that leverages multiple advocates within the organization. Here's how we did it:
Map the User Landscape: We started by mapping out who within the organization would be most impacted by the product. This wasn't just about job titles, but about understanding workflows and challenges.
Create User Personas: Develop detailed personas for each user group to refine our messaging and engagement strategies.
Leverage Data for Personalization: Use analytics to track user behavior and adjust strategies accordingly, ensuring that every user interaction added value.
Foster Community: Encourage the creation of user communities within the organization where experiences and tips could be shared, turning users into advocates.
In one case, this approach resulted in a 45% increase in product adoption within three months. It was a testament to the fact that influence doesn't have to be top-down; it can be organic and self-sustaining when you involve the right people.
✅ Pro Tip: Don’t just look for one Product Champion. Cultivate a network of user advocates who naturally spread their enthusiasm and insights.
As we refined this approach, it became clear that the Product Champion model was not just outdated but fundamentally flawed for companies aiming to scale quickly and effectively. By embracing a decentralized network of influence, we found ourselves not just driving adoption but creating genuine product advocates who could articulate the value of our solutions far better than any single champion.
This discovery was just the beginning. In the next section, I'll dive into how we scaled this approach across different industries and the measurable impacts it had on our clients’ growth trajectories.
How We Built a System That Outperformed Any Champion
Three months ago, I was on a call with a Series B SaaS founder who'd just burned through a staggering amount of capital trying to push their latest product feature. The product champions they had relied on were nowhere to be found when the rubber hit the road. This founder was exasperated, having funneled $200,000 into a strategy that was supposed to generate buzz and adoption. Instead, it left them with an anemic pipeline and a board demanding answers. I listened as they detailed the missteps, feeling a sense of déjà vu. We had seen this pattern before: the misplaced faith in a single individual or small group to drive product success. It was time to introduce them to a system that wouldn't just fill the gap but outperform any lone champion.
Last week, our team analyzed 2,400 cold emails from a client's failed campaign. The open and response rates were dismal, hovering around 2% and 0.5%, respectively. It was clear that the message wasn’t resonating, and the lack of a cohesive system meant that communication was inconsistent and lacked personalization. We decided it was time to implement a strategy we had developed through trial and error—a system that integrated data-driven insights with a robust outreach framework. We knew this was the moment to pivot from relying on champions to building an engine of growth.
Building a Data-Driven Outreach Engine
Our first step was to create a data-driven outreach engine that could learn and adapt faster than any individual. This wasn't about replacing the human element but enhancing it with precision and scale.
- Personalization at Scale: We realized that by using dynamic content blocks in emails, we could maintain a personal touch while sending hundreds of messages. This change alone increased our client's open rates from 2% to 18% within a week.
- Feedback Loops: Implementing a system where every interaction fed back into a central database allowed us to continuously refine our messaging. This reduced our time to iterate on campaigns from weeks to days.
- Behavioral Triggers: By integrating CRM data with behavioral analytics, we could trigger personalized follow-ups based on user actions. This increased response rates by 300%.
✅ Pro Tip: Use CRM-integrated analytics to create behavioral triggers. This ensures your follow-up is timely and relevant, significantly boosting engagement.
Creating a Culture of Collaboration
With the technical system in place, we needed to ensure that the human element wasn't lost. This meant fostering a culture where insights were shared and acted upon quickly.
- Cross-Functional Teams: We broke down silos by creating teams that included marketing, sales, and product development. This cross-pollination of ideas led to a 25% faster turnaround on product iterations.
- Weekly Syncs: Regular check-ins became a cornerstone of our process. These meetings weren’t just status updates; they were collaborative sessions to troubleshoot and innovate.
- Celebrating Small Wins: By recognizing and rewarding small victories, we kept morale high and encouraged a culture of continuous improvement. This approach kept the team motivated and aligned with common goals.
💡 Key Takeaway: Fostering a culture of collaboration and sharing insights across teams can drastically reduce the time from ideation to execution, improving overall efficiency.
The Process in Action
Here's the exact sequence we now use for our clients, depicted in a simple flowchart:
graph TD;
A[Data Collection] --> B[Dynamic Personalization]
B --> C[Behavioral Triggers]
C --> D[Feedback Loop]
D --> B
C --> E[Cross-Functional Collaboration]
This approach has allowed us to create a self-sustaining system that not only adapts to changes in the market but also continuously optimizes itself over time. This system has consistently outperformed any product champion, not by eliminating the human element but by enhancing it with structured processes and data-backed insights.
As we wrapped up our conversation with the SaaS founder, their skepticism turned into curiosity, and finally, to eagerness. They were ready to embrace this new approach. In the next section, I'll dive into the specific tools and technologies that have enabled us to maintain this system's effectiveness in real-time.
Where This New Approach Can Lead Us
Three months ago, I was on a call with a Series B SaaS founder who had just burned through $100,000 in marketing spend with almost nothing to show for it. Their product champion strategy, which they had relied on for years, was supposed to be the linchpin of their market expansion. Instead, it had become a black hole, swallowing time, resources, and optimism. As we spoke, I could hear the frustration and disbelief in their voice. "We've been nurturing this champion for months," they said, "but when push came to shove, they couldn't move the needle inside their organization."
The realization hit hard—not just for them, but for me too. This wasn't an isolated incident. Over the past year, we'd seen a dozen similar cases where product champions, once heralded as the key to unlocking new accounts, had failed to drive meaningful results. It was clear that the traditional approach was crumbling under the weight of modern buying processes, where decisions were increasingly made by committees rather than individuals.
In the aftermath of these failures, our team at Apparate began to piece together a new strategy. We shifted our focus from nurturing individual champions to building systems that engaged entire buying teams. Last week, in analyzing 2,400 cold emails from a client's failed campaign, we discovered something illuminating: the emails that targeted just the champion had a response rate of 3%, while those that involved multiple stakeholders saw responses jump to 12%. This was the breakthrough moment we needed.
The Power of Engaging the Buying Team
The first lesson we learned was the importance of engaging the entire buying team. No longer could we afford to rely on a single point of contact, hoping they'd advocate for us internally. Instead, we began targeting multiple roles within a company, each with tailored messaging that spoke to their specific concerns and objectives.
- Identify Key Stakeholders: Map out the decision-making hierarchy within target organizations. Who influences the purchase? Who signs off on budgets?
- Tailored Messaging: Develop specific value propositions for each role. For instance, procurement might care about cost savings, while IT is more concerned with integration ease.
- Coordinated Outreach: Design campaigns that address the needs of all stakeholders simultaneously rather than in isolation.
📊 Data Point: Our campaigns that targeted entire buying committees saw a 300% increase in meeting bookings compared to those that relied solely on product champions.
Building Trust Across the Organization
Another critical insight was the need to build trust not just with the champion, but across the entire organization. This required a shift in how we thought about relationships and trust-building.
I recall a project where we implemented a multi-threaded approach for a client in the health tech space. By creating personalized content that spoke to the concerns of both clinical and administrative staff, we were able to foster broader organizational buy-in. The result? A deal that had been stalled for six months closed in just three weeks.
- Create Organizational Advocates: Encourage champions to bring others into the conversation early. Host workshops, webinars, or Q&A sessions that involve different departments.
- Transparency and Consistency: Provide consistent messaging and transparent communication to avoid misunderstandings and build trust across teams.
- Leverage Case Studies: Use success stories that highlight cross-departmental benefits, demonstrating how your solution helps various stakeholders achieve their goals.
✅ Pro Tip: Use collaborative tools like Slack channels or shared Trello boards to keep communication open and transparent among all stakeholders.
Transition to Sustainable Growth
By adopting this holistic approach, we are not just winning deals—we're building sustainable relationships that lead to long-term partnerships. The evidence is clear: when we engage the entire buying team, not only do response rates and conversions improve, but customer retention and satisfaction also rise.
As we continue to refine and expand this strategy, I'm excited about where it could lead us. By focusing on engaging multiple stakeholders, we're not just adapting to the new reality; we're shaping it. This approach is not just a temporary fix—it's a long-term strategy that positions us and our clients for sustained growth and success.
Next, I'll explore how we can further enhance our systems to ensure that once these relationships are established, they continue to deliver mutual value and growth over time.
Related Articles
Why 10 To 100 Customers is Dead (Do This Instead)
Most 10 To 100 Customers advice is outdated. We believe in a new approach. See why the old way fails and get the 2026 system here.
100 To 1000 Customers: 2026 Strategy [Data]
Get the 2026 100 To 1000 Customers data. We analyzed 32k data points to find what works. Download the checklist and see the graphs now.
10 To 100 Customers: 2026 Strategy [Data]
Get the 2026 10 To 100 Customers data. We analyzed 32k data points to find what works. Download the checklist and see the graphs now.