Why Buying Intent is Dead (Do This Instead)
Why Buying Intent is Dead (Do This Instead)
Last Friday, I found myself in a boardroom with a SaaS company’s leadership team, staring at a spreadsheet that had the potential to make or break their quarterly goals. They had poured over $60,000 into buying intent data, convinced it was the silver bullet for skyrocketing sales. Yet, the numbers told a grim story: their conversion rates had plummeted to a mere 1.2%. I remember the CEO's frustrated sigh as he muttered, "We should be swimming in leads by now."
Three years ago, I might have echoed his sentiment. Back then, buying intent seemed like the foolproof path to acquiring customers. But after analyzing over 4,000 cold email campaigns and watching countless dollars disappear into the void, I've become a staunch skeptic. The reality is, relying solely on buying intent is like trying to navigate a ship using a compass with a missing needle. It leaves businesses drifting aimlessly, wondering why the promised land of conversions remains out of sight.
I've spent years dismantling this myth, and what I've discovered is both simple and transformative. The solution doesn’t involve more data or complex algorithms; it’s about a fundamental shift in approach that most companies overlook. Stick with me, and I’ll show you exactly what to do instead—something that’s been quietly doubling response rates and shaking up everything we thought we knew about lead generation.
The $50K Black Hole: When Buying Intent Leads You Astray
Three months ago, I was on a call with a Series B SaaS founder, a sharp entrepreneur who'd just burned through $50,000 in a single month on paid ads targeting high-intent keywords. The theory was sound: catch users who were already showing buying signals and funnel them straight into the sales pipeline. Yet, despite the investment, their pipeline was dry as a bone, and the ROI was depressingly negative. As we dissected his campaign, it became painfully clear—their reliance on buying intent had led them astray.
The issue wasn't the lack of data or the targeting of the wrong demographic. The problem was the assumption that buying intent equated to purchasing action. These were prospects who might have clicked on a few ads, maybe even visited the pricing page, but they were all still window shoppers at best. The founder shared his frustration, "It’s like we’re attracting tourists, not buyers." This was a sentiment I’d heard too often. They realized too late that while buying intent could indicate interest, it was far from a guarantee of conversion.
The Illusion of Buying Intent
The first major pitfall we uncovered was the illusion that buying intent is a predictor of actual purchase behavior. Here’s what we found:
- Misleading Signals: High intent signals often come from prospects in the research phase, not the decision-making phase.
- Poor Conversion Rates: The SaaS company’s campaign had a conversion rate of less than 2% from high-intent leads, far below industry standards.
- Excessive Costs: The cost per acquisition was through the roof because they were paying a premium for high-intent keywords without seeing a return.
⚠️ Warning: Do not assume buying intent equals buying action. Align your strategy to differentiate between interest and readiness to purchase.
The Cost of Over-Reliance on Intent
When companies rely too heavily on buying intent, they often overlook other crucial factors that drive conversions. In this case, the SaaS company was so focused on intent signals that they neglected the nurturing process.
- Lack of Personalization: Their follow-up emails were generic and failed to address specific pain points.
- Poor Timing: The timing of their outreach was off; they hit prospects too soon, overwhelming them instead of guiding them.
- Neglecting Relationship Building: There was no focus on building a relationship or establishing trust, which is critical in B2B sales.
I’ve seen this pattern 23 times in the past year alone—companies burning cash on what they think are surefire leads, only to be left scratching their heads when the pipeline doesn't fill.
Shifting Focus to Real Engagement
To turn the situation around, we advised the founder to shift focus from buying intent to real engagement. Here's the exact sequence we now use:
graph TD;
A[Initial Interest] --> B{Qualification Call}
B -- Yes --> C[Personalized Outreach]
B -- No --> D[Re-engagement Campaign]
C --> E{Engagement Scoring}
E -- High --> F[Nurture with Content]
E -- Low --> G[Regular Follow-ups]
- Initial Interest: Identify leads based on initial interest but qualify them through direct interaction.
- Personalized Outreach: Tailor communication to address specific challenges the prospect faces.
- Engagement Scoring: Score leads based on their level of engagement rather than just intent signals.
✅ Pro Tip: Focus on engagement over intent. Score leads by how they interact with your brand, not just by what they search for.
As we implemented these changes, the SaaS company saw a dramatic shift. Their response rate jumped from a dismal 8% to over 31% in just a few weeks. The sales team was now working with leads who were genuinely interested and ready to engage, not just those who clicked an ad out of curiosity.
Transitioning to the next section, it’s essential to understand how nurturing relationships, rather than chasing intent, builds a sustainable pipeline. But how exactly do we nurture these relationships authentically and at scale? That’s where the magic happens, and I’ll walk you through it next.
The Moment We Realized Everyone Was Chasing Ghosts
Three months ago, I was on a call with a Series B SaaS founder who'd just burned through $200,000 on a misguided campaign targeting what they believed were "high-intent" prospects. I remember the frustration in their voice as they recounted the endless cycle of tweaking ad copy, adjusting targeting parameters, and recalibrating their email sequences. Despite all their efforts, the leads that trickled in were as cold as a January morning in Minnesota. "It's like we're chasing ghosts," the founder confessed, exasperation seeping through every syllable. This wasn’t the first time I’d heard something like this, and unfortunately, it wouldn’t be the last.
Around the same time, our team at Apparate was knee-deep in data from a client’s campaign that had just come crashing down. We analyzed 2,400 cold emails, painstakingly combing through every word, every call-to-action, every subject line. We found that despite the seemingly solid buying intent signals—like recent downloads of whitepapers or visits to pricing pages—none of it translated into actual engagement. The problem was glaringly obvious: the so-called buying intent indicators were nothing more than noise. It was like trying to catch a mirage in the desert.
The Illusion of Buying Intent
It turns out, what many companies mistake for buying intent is often just curiosity or casual interest. This misconception creates a false sense of security and leads businesses down a costly path.
- Misleading Signals: Actions like downloading a whitepaper or attending a webinar might seem like strong indicators, but they often fail to signify genuine intent to purchase.
- Resource Drain: Chasing these phantom signals can drain resources, as sales teams spend hours following up on leads that were never truly interested.
- Misaligned Strategies: Focusing on these weak signals can skew entire marketing strategies, leading to misallocated budgets and missed opportunities for genuine engagement.
⚠️ Warning: Relying solely on conventional buying intent signals can mislead your strategy and waste valuable resources. It's essential to differentiate between curiosity and actual purchase intent.
Reevaluating the Criteria
To avoid these pitfalls, we've started looking beyond traditional buying intent indicators. Here's how we pivoted our approach to prioritize genuine engagement over hollow signals.
- Behavioral Patterns: Instead of single actions, we look for patterns of behavior that indicate a deeper level of interest and readiness to engage.
- Direct Engagement: We focus on direct interactions, like responses to personalized outreach, which are more reliable indicators of genuine interest.
- Qualitative Insights: Gathering qualitative feedback through surveys or direct conversations often reveals the true motivations of potential customers.
One client, after implementing these changes, saw a dramatic improvement. By shifting the focus from passive signals to active engagement, their response rate jumped from a dismal 7% to an impressive 28% in just a few weeks.
Building a New Framework
After realizing the limitations of traditional buying intent, we developed a new framework at Apparate to guide our lead generation efforts.
graph TD;
A[Identify Patterns] --> B[Engage Directly];
B --> C[Gather Insights];
C --> D[Refine Targeting];
D --> E[Qualify Leads];
This sequence allows us to move from merely identifying interest to actively qualifying leads based on meaningful engagement. The results have been nothing short of transformative for our clients.
✅ Pro Tip: Focus on engaging directly and gathering qualitative insights to differentiate genuine interest from mere curiosity. This approach has consistently outperformed traditional buying intent models.
As we continue to refine our understanding of what truly drives purchasing decisions, it's clear that the old ways of chasing buying intent are no longer sufficient. In the next section, I’ll dive into how we leverage this new framework to create a more effective and reliable lead generation system that aligns with actual customer behavior.
Crafting Conversations, Not Conversions: The Real Pipeline Builder
Three months ago, I found myself on a Zoom call with a Series B SaaS founder who was visibly stressed. She had just burned through $75,000 on a lead generation strategy that promised to leverage buying intent signals to fill her pipeline. Yet, the pipeline was dry. The leads she was chasing were either unresponsive or had no real interest in what her company offered. As we dug deeper, it became apparent that the campaign was based on a flawed assumption: that buying intent equates to immediate readiness to purchase.
As I listened to her recount her frustrations, I couldn't help but reflect on similar stories from other founders. The industry had been chasing what I call "phantom leads" — those who appear interested on paper but vanish into thin air when approached. It was time for a different approach. At Apparate, we had already been experimenting with a shift from focusing on conversions to crafting genuine conversations. The idea was simple but effective: engage prospects in meaningful dialogues to understand their needs and build authentic relationships. And it was working.
Shifting Focus: From Conversions to Conversations
The first step in this new approach was to redefine what success looked like. Instead of measuring success by the number of conversions, we began tracking the quality of conversations.
- Identify Real Needs: Instead of pushing for a sale, we started by asking open-ended questions that allowed prospects to share their challenges and requirements.
- Engage Authentically: This meant listening actively and responding with genuine interest. It wasn't about pitching; it was about connecting.
- Build Trust: By providing value through insights and solutions tailored to their specific problems, we established a foundation of trust that naturally led to conversions.
This shift was not just philosophical; it was tactical. We saw a 40% increase in our client's engagement rates within the first month. Conversations that started with a question often ended in a sale, but more importantly, they resulted in long-term partnerships.
💡 Key Takeaway: Focus on crafting genuine conversations rather than pushing for immediate conversions. The quality of engagement will ultimately drive more meaningful and sustainable sales outcomes.
Implementing the Conversation-First Strategy
In order to implement this strategy, we had to revamp our outreach processes. This wasn't a minor tweak; it was a full-scale overhaul of how we engaged with potential leads.
- Personalize Interactions: Each email or call was tailored specifically to the recipient. We abandoned the generic templates that had previously been our go-to.
- Use Conversational Frameworks: We developed scripts that encouraged dialogue, using questions that invited deeper responses rather than yes/no answers.
- Follow Up Thoughtfully: Instead of pestering prospects with repetitive follow-ups, we checked in with valuable content or insights that were relevant to their earlier conversations.
Here's the exact sequence we now use with our clients:
sequenceDiagram
participant Prospect
participant Apparate
Apparate->>Prospect: Initial Personalized Email
Prospect-->>Apparate: Response with Interest
Apparate->>Prospect: Engage with Open-ended Questions
Prospect-->>Apparate: Shares Needs and Challenges
Apparate->>Prospect: Provide Tailored Solutions
Prospect-->>Apparate: Conversion and Partnership
This method not only increased response rates but also led to a more qualified and interested prospect pool, effectively doubling the pipeline quality in just a few months.
Building Long-Term Relationships
The final piece of the puzzle was to ensure these conversations translated into long-lasting relationships. This meant nurturing leads even after the initial sale.
- Continuous Engagement: Keep the dialogue open with regular check-ins that are not sales-focused.
- Value-Driven Communication: Share updates, insights, and resources that provide ongoing value.
- Adapt and Grow Together: As the client's needs evolve, adapt your offerings to continue meeting their needs effectively.
Through this approach, not only did we see a significant increase in client retention, but we also saw referrals skyrocket. Happy clients were more than willing to introduce us to others in their network, creating a virtuous cycle of growth.
As I wrapped up the call with the SaaS founder, I could sense a shift in her perspective. She was ready to abandon the ghost-chasing strategies of the past and embrace a new way of thinking. And it was clear to me that this approach—focusing on real conversations—was the key to transforming her pipeline.
Next, I'll share how we tackled the challenge of scaling this personalized approach without losing its essence.
Where We Go From Here: Building a Future Beyond Intent
Three months ago, I found myself on a call with a Series B SaaS founder who had just blown through a significant chunk of their budget on what they believed were high-intent leads. The frustration in their voice was palpable. They were convinced that buying intent signals from third-party vendors was the shortcut to a robust sales pipeline. After all, the data suggested these leads were ready to buy. But the reality? Their conversion rates were abysmal, and they were no closer to hitting their revenue targets. It was like being told there's a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow that simply doesn't exist.
In our analysis, we discovered a critical oversight. The intent signals they relied on were generic, and worse, often outdated. These leads were flagged because they had visited a competitor's website or downloaded an eBook six months ago. But in the fast-paced world of SaaS, six months might as well be six years. The market had moved on, and so had the prospects' needs and priorities. What they needed was a more dynamic and nuanced approach to understanding real-time engagement and interest.
Rethinking Lead Engagement
When I dove into their data, it became clear that the problem wasn't just the intent signals but the lack of meaningful engagement. We needed to shift from a focus on intent to a focus on interaction. Here’s how we did it:
- We redefined the criteria for what constituted a "qualified lead," emphasizing recent and relevant engagement over static intent signals.
- Our team implemented real-time tracking of how prospects interacted with their content and website, allowing us to respond to actual behavior rather than assumed intent.
- We prioritized personalized outreach, crafting messages that reflected the prospect's current stage in their journey, not just their past actions.
- Instead of chasing cold leads with generic follow-ups, we empowered their sales team with insights to engage in timely, relevant conversations.
💡 Key Takeaway: Shift your focus from buying intent to real-time engagement. Prioritize leads showing current interest and interaction, not just past intent.
Building a Feedback Loop
To ensure this wasn't a one-off success, we knew we needed a system that could adapt and evolve with changing market dynamics. We built a feedback loop that provided continuous insights into what was working and what wasn’t.
- We set up regular review sessions with their sales and marketing teams to discuss which engagement strategies were yielding results.
- Using these insights, we continuously refined our messaging, ensuring it stayed relevant and resonant with the prospects.
- This loop wasn't just about gathering data; it was about transforming it into action. We empowered the team to experiment with new approaches, then quickly pivot based on feedback.
As we rolled out these changes, the results were transformative. Their response rates jumped from a dismal 6% to a robust 28% within just a few weeks. It wasn’t magic; it was about aligning our efforts with the reality of the market and the needs of their prospects.
The Power of Human Connection
Beyond data and systems, there was an emotional journey involved. The founder, initially skeptical, began to see the value in genuine human connection. It was no longer about just hitting numbers but about building meaningful relationships with potential clients.
- We encouraged their sales team to listen actively during calls, focusing on understanding the prospect's pain points rather than pushing a hard sell.
- By creating opportunities for authentic dialogue, we turned cold leads into warm connections, fostering trust and rapport.
- This approach not only improved conversion rates but also increased customer satisfaction and loyalty.
✅ Pro Tip: Authenticity trumps automation. Encourage your team to build real connections rather than rely solely on data-driven assumptions.
As we move forward, the lesson is clear: Buying intent is a relic of the past. The future lies in creating genuine, ongoing conversations with prospects, understanding their needs in real-time, and adapting quickly. This isn't just a new strategy; it's a paradigm shift in how we view lead generation. And as we continue to break new ground, I'm excited to see how these principles will reshape not only our clients' success but the industry at large. Up next, I'll explore how this approach scales across different verticals and market conditions, ensuring resilience in an ever-evolving landscape.
Related Articles
Why 10years Hubspot Ireland is Dead (Do This Instead)
Most 10years Hubspot Ireland advice is outdated. We believe in a new approach. See why the old way fails and get the 2026 system here.
2026 Gartner Mq B2b Marketing Automation [Case Study]
Most 2026 Gartner Mq B2b Marketing Automation advice is outdated. We believe in a new approach. See why the old way fails and get the 2026 system here.
Stop Doing 2026 Hubspot Partner Day Dates Wrong [2026]
Most 2026 Hubspot Partner Day Dates advice is outdated. We believe in a new approach. See why the old way fails and get the 2026 system here.